The databases have been developed to summarize available scientific literature to demonstrate efficacy of various interventions and/or antimicrobials at a range of applicable concentrations for fresh and processed meat and poultry. They may be used to identify scientific support for HACCP Systems Validation by small and very small establishments.

The database is searchable via the drop-down menu, the type-in search bar or both. Use the category drop-down menu to select specific interests or type in key words in the search bar, or use both to narrow down search results.

Veal

ReferenceProductType of MeatMicroorganism TestedProcess / InterventionPathogen EffectOperational ParametersCritical Operational ParametersComments
Hasty, J. D., J. A. Henson, G. R. Acuff, D. E. Burson, J. B. Luchansky, N. J. Sevart, R. K. Phebus, A. C. S. Porto-Fett, and H. Thippareddi. 2018. Validation of a Sequential Hide-On Bob Veal Carcass Antimicrobial
Intervention Composed of a Hot Water Wash and Lactic Acid Spray
in Combination with Scalding To Control Shiga Toxin–Producing
Escherichia coli Surrogates. Journal of Food Protection. 81:762-768. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-403
Hide on carcassesVealE. coli O157:H7 Surrogates(i) Scalding
(ii) Hot water wash
(iii) Lactic acid spray
Combinations of the above also were evaluated.
Bactericidal(i) Scalding
Time: 4 min
Temperature: 60°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Hog scald paddles were not used. Treatment was tested with and without dehairing chemicals (Nu Scald and Hard Scald from Birko Corp.)
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): n/a
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide on veal carcasses
(ii) Water wash
Time: 1 minute
Temperature: 82.2°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: hand-held hose
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide on veal carcasses
(iii) Lactic acid spray
Time: NE
Temperature: 25°C
Concentration: 4.5%
Volume: 652ml per carcass
Equipment Settings: hand pump sprayer
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide on veal carcasses
(i) Scalding
Time: 4 min
Temperature: 60°C
Equipment Settings: Hog scald paddles were not used. Treatment was tested with and without dehairing chemicals (Nu Scald and Hard Scald from Birko Corp.)
(ii) Water wash
Time: 1 minute
Temperature: 82.2°C
(iii) Lactic acid spray
Temperature: 25°C
Concentration: 4.5%
Volume: 652ml per carcass
Author's summary of findings:
Spraying with 82.2C water as a final wash resulted in a 4.5-log CFU/100 cm2 surrogate reduction, and an additional 1.2-log CFU/100 cm2 reduction was achieved by spraying with 4.5% lactic acid before chilling.
Scalding hide-on carcasses in 60C water (no chemicals added) resulted in a 2.1-log CFU/100 cm2 reduction in surrogate levels, and a subsequent preevisceration 82.2C water wash provided an additional 2.9-log CFU/100 cm2 reduction.
Spraying a 4.5% solution of lactic acid onto scalded, hide-on carcasses (after the 82.2C water wash) resulted in a minimal additional reduction of 0.4 log CFU/100 cm2.
Incorporation of scalding chemicals into the scald water resulted in a 4.1-log CFU/100 cm2 reduction (1.9 log CFU/100 cm2 greater than scalding without chemicals) in the surrogate population.
Wang, R., M. Koohmaraie, B. Luedtke, T. Wheeler, and J. Bosilevac. 2014. Effects of in-plant interventions on reduction of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli and background indicator microorganisms on veal calf hides. J. Food Prot. 77(5):745-751HidesVealLevels:
Total aerobic bacteria
Enterobacteriaceae
Coliforms
Escherichia coli (Generic)

Prevalence:
Salmonella spp.
Escherichia coli O157:H7
non-O157 Escherichia coli EHEC
(i) Water rinse + manual curry comb of the hide
(ii) 200ppm of chlorine + a hot water rinse
(iii) 5-min treatment of chlorine foam + 180-200ppm of acidified sodium chlorite
Bactericidal(i) Water Spray
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: 1 inch garden hose at a distance of approx. 1 m.
Pressure Delivery: 12-15 lb/in2 (82.737 X 103 to 103.421 X 103 Pa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spay
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide (antemortem)
(ii) Manual Curry Comb
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Curry Comb
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): NE
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide (antemortem)
(iii) Chlorine Spray
Time: 5-10 min of dwell time
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 200 ppm
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Automated spray system at a distance of approx. 1-2 m.
Pressure Delivery: 20 to 30 lb/in2 (137.895 X 103 to 206.843 X 103 Pa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide (postmortem)
(iv) Hot Water Rinse
Time: 5 s
Temperature: 24° C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Flow Thru scrub brush and squeegee
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray rinse of the pattern line
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide (postmortem)
(v) Chlorine Foam
Time: approx 5 min dwell time
Temperature: NE
Concentration: AFCO 5333 Power Foam prepared at 3oz/gal [85 g/3.785 liters] of water
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: 2 gal. (7.57-liter) hand pump garden sprayer at a distance of approx. 1 m
Pressure Delivery: 5 to 10 lb/in2 (34.474 X 103 to 68.948 X 103 Pa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide (postmortem)
(vi) Acidified Sodium Chlorite Rinse
Time: approx NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 180-200ppm of acidified sodium chlorite
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: distance of 1-2 m
Pressure Delivery: 20 to 30 lb/ in2 (137.895 X 103 to 206.843 X 103 Pa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hide (postmortem)
(i) Water Spray
Equipment Settings: 1 inch garden hose at a distance of approx. 1 m.
Pressure Delivery: 12-15 lb/in2 (82.737 X 103 to 103.421 X 103 Pa)
(ii) Manual Curry Comb
Equipment Settings: Curry Comb
(iii) Chlorine Spray
Time: 5-10 min of dwell time
Concentration: 200 ppm
Equipment Settings: Automated spray system at a distance of approx. 1-2 m.
Pressure Delivery: 20 to 30 lb/in2 (137.895 X 103 to 206.843 X 103 Pa)
(iv) Hot Water Rinse
Time: 5 s
Temperature: 24° C
Equipment Settings: Flow Thru scrub brush and squeegee
(v) Chlorine Foam
Time: approx 5 min dwell time
Concentration: AFCO 5333 Power Foam prepared at 3oz/gal [85 g/3.785 liters] of water
Equipment Settings: 2 gal. (7.57-liter) hand pump garden sprayer at a distance of approx. 1 m
Pressure Delivery: 5 to 10 lb/in2 (34.474 X 103 to 68.948 X 103 Pa)
(vi) Acidified Sodium Chlorite Rinse
Concentration: 180-200ppm of acidified sodium chlorite
Equipment Settings: distance of 1-2 m
Pressure Delivery: 20 to 30 lb/ in2 (137.895 X 103 to 206.843 X 103 Pa)
Interventions A, B, and C reduced indicator organisms (P<0.05) by 0.8 to 3.5 log CFU, 2.1 to 2.7 log CFU, and 1.0 to 1.5 log CFU, respectively

No Salmonella was detected on hides prior to intervention

E. coli O157:H7 prevalence was observed at only one plant, so comparison was not possible

Other non-O157 EHECs (O26, O103, and O111) were observed for all interventions studied.

Interventions A and B reduced culture-confirmed non O157 EHEC by 29 and 21%, respectively, whereas intervention C did not reduce non-O157 EHEC.

The most effective veal hide intervention for reducing indicator organisms and EHECs was the application of 200 ppm of chlorine followed by hot water rinse
Sevart, N., N. Baumann, H. Thippareddi, T. Houser, J. Luchansky, A. Porto-Fett, D. Marx, G. Acuff, and R. Phebus. 2016. Evaluating the Efficacy of Three U.S. Department of Agriculture–Approved Antimicrobial Sprays for Reducing Shiga
Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli Surrogate Populations on Bob Veal Carcasses. J. Food Prot. 79(6):956-962. 
Hot CarcassVealrifampin-resistant, Escherichia coli surrogates(i) Water Wash
(ii) Warm Water Wash + Lactic Acid
(iii) Warm Water Wash + Citrilow (mixture of citric acid and hydrochloric acid in water)
(iv) Warm Water Wash + Beefxide (mixture of lactic acid and citric acids in water)
(v) Chilling

**Antimicrobial Interventions were applied pre-chill and then again post-chill
Bactericidal(i) Standard Water Spray Wash
Time: 1 min wash, drip for 5 min pre-intervention
Temperature: Approx. 50°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: handheld hose with spray nozzle (M-70 nozzle)
Pressure Delivery: 70 lb/in2, 26.5 liter/min, narrow spray setting
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): wash
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot carcass
(ii)L-lactic Acid
Time: Drip for 5 min
Temperature: Approx. 20°C
Concentration: 4.5%, pH 2.0
Volume: Approx 326 mL/carcass
Equipment Settings: 11.4-liter poly pump sprayer (ie hand-pump garden sprayer)
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot carcass then repeated after 24 h in -2°C cooler
(iii) Citrilow
Time: Drip for 5 min
Temperature: Approx. 20°C
Concentration: pH 1.2
Volume: 326 mL/carcass
Equipment Settings: 11.4-liter poly pump sprayer (ie hand-pump garden sprayer)
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot carcass then repeated after 24 h in -2°C cooler
(iv) Beefxide
Time: Drip for 5 min
Temperature: Approx. 20°C
Concentration: 2.25%, pH 2.3
Volume: 326 mL/carcass
Equipment Settings: 11.4-liter poly pump sprayer (ie hand-pump garden sprayer)
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot carcass then repeated after 24 h in -2°C cooler
(i) Standard Water Spray Wash
Time: 1 min wash, drip for 5 min pre-intervention
Temperature: Approx. 50°C
Equipment Settings: handheld hose with spray nozzle (M-70 nozzle)
Pressure Delivery: 70 lb/in2, 26.5 liter/min, narrow spray setting
(ii)L-lactic Acid
Time: Drip for 5 min
Temperature: Approx. 20°C
Concentration: 4.5%, pH 2.0
Volume: Approx 326 mL/carcass
Equipment Settings: 11.4-liter poly pump sprayer (ie hand-pump garden sprayer)
(iii) Citrilow
Time: Drip for 5 min
Temperature: Approx. 20°C
Concentration: pH 1.2
Volume: 326 mL/carcass
Equipment Settings: 11.4-liter poly pump sprayer (ie hand-pump garden sprayer)
(iv) Beefxide
Time: Drip for 5 min
Temperature: Approx. 20°C
Concentration: 2.25%, pH 2.3
Volume: 326 mL/carcass
Equipment Settings: 11.4-liter poly pump sprayer (ie hand-pump garden sprayer)
All three antimicrobial sprays applied to prerigor carcasses delivered an additional ~0.5-log reduction (P ≤ 0.05) of the surrogates.

Chilling of carcasses for 24 h reduced (P ≤ 0.05) the surrogate population by an additional ~0.4 log cycles.

The postchill application of the antimicrobial sprays provided no further reductions.

Generally, the types and concentrations of the antimicrobial sprays evaluated herein did not negatively impact visual or instrumental color of chilled veal carcasses.

This study demonstrates that warm water washing, followed by a prechill spray treatment with a low-pH chemical intervention, can effectively reduce STEC risks associated with veal carcasses;
Smulders, F. and C. Woolthuis. 1983. Influence of Two Levels of Hygiene on the Microbiological Condition of Veal as a Product of Two Slaughtering/Processing Sequences. J. Food Prot. 46(12):1032-1035Hot boned cutsVealAerobic Plate Counts (APC)
Enterobacteriaceae
Salmonella spp.
(i) Strictly Hygienic
(ii) Hygienic
(iii) L-Lactic Acid
Bactericidal(i) Strictly Hygienic
a. Surgical Gloves
b. Disinfected Knives with 70% ethanol and subsequent flaming after each incision
(ii) Hygienic
a. No Gloves
b. Visually clean knife when starting the excision
(iii) L-Lactic Acid
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 1% v/v prepared from an 80% L-Lactic acid stock solution
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot boned cuts
(i) Strictly Hygienic
a. Surgical Gloves
b. Disinfected Knives with 70% ethanol and subsequent flaming after each incision
(ii) Hygienic
a. No Gloves
b. Visually clean knife when starting the excision
(iii) L-Lactic Acid
Concentration: 1% v/v prepared from an 80% L-Lactic acid stock solution
The effect of "strictly hygienic" practices in both alternative and conventional slaughtering/processing procedure is evident: samplings immediately after hot boning and cold boning revealed counts 0.5 and 1.0 log units lower (p<.025 and p<.001), respectively, than "hygienic" practices.

Lactic acid did not appear to affect counts at 7 d post mortem in comparison to counts resulting from "hygienic" practices only.

At 14 d post mortem the decontaminating effect of lactic acid became manifest. 
Penney, N., T. Bigwood, H. Barea, D. Pulford, G. LeRoux, R. Cook, G. Jarvis, and G. Brightwell. 2007. Efficacy of a peroxyacetic acid formulation as an antimicrobial intervention to reduce levels of inoculated Escherichia coli O157 : H7 on external carcass surfaces of hot-boned beef and veal. J. Food Prot. 70(1): 200-203.Hot CarcassVealEscherichia coli O157:H7(i) Water Wash
(ii) Peroxyacetic acid (POAA) wash
(ii) Water + POAA wash
Bactericidal(i) Water Wash
Time: 5s
Temperature: Approx 20°C
Concentration: potable water
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): wash
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot cx
(ii)  Peroxyacetic acid (POAA) Spray (Inspexx 200)
Time: 5s
Temperature: Approx 20°C
Concentration: 180ppm total peroxyacids
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: 3 fan spray nozzles 28 cm apart, able to rotated, 30 cm away from product
Pressure Delivery: Wilden pump with a pulse dampener was set to deliver the Inspexx 200 with an even pressure of 6 bar at the nozzle sprayer
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): sprayed
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot carcass
(i) Water Wash
Time: 5s
Temperature: Approx 20°C
Concentration: potable water
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): wash
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot cx
(ii)  Peroxyacetic acid (POAA) Spray (Inspexx 200)
Time: 5s
Temperature: Approx 20°C
Concentration: 180ppm total peroxyacids
Equipment Settings: 3 fan spray nozzles 28 cm apart, able to rotated, 30 cm away from product
Pressure Delivery: Wilden pump with a pulse dampener was set to deliver the Inspexx 200 with an even pressure of 6 bar at the nozzle sprayer
A water wash alone resulted in a 1.25 (94.4%) mean log reduction on veal inoculated with a high dose of E. coli O157:H7.

The POAA treatment resulted in a substantially greater mean log reduction of 3.56 ( 99.9%) on veal inoculated with a high dose of E. coli O157:H7.

The water wash only resulted in a 33.9%
reduction on veal inoculated with a low dose of E. coli O157:H7, whereas POAA treatment greatly improved pathogen reduction to 98.9 on veal.

The combination of a water wash followed by a POAA treatment resulted in a similar E. coli O157:H7 reduction to that achieved by POAA treatment alone. 
Houser, B., M. Soehnlen, D. Wolfgang, H. Lysczek, C. Burns, and B. Jayarao. 2012. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile Toxin Genes in the Feces of Veal Calves and Incidence of Ground Veal Contamination. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 9(1): 32-36.Hot Carcass and Ground VealVealToxigenic Clostridium difficileCitric Acid (2.25%) WashBactericidal(i) Citric Acid Wash
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 2.25%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): wash
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot carcass 
(i) Citric Acid Wash
Concentration: 2.25%
We observed a very low prevalence of C. difficile toxin genes in pre-wash carcass swabs collected at the abattoir. No toxin genes were detected on post-citric acid wash carcass swabs.

Toxin genes of C. difficile were detected by multiplex real-time PCR in 4 out of 50 (8%) ground veal samples that originated from the veal processor that participated in the study. These results suggest that either carcass washing does not completely eliminate TXCD contamination or TXCD contamination occurs during processing sometime after the carcass wash


Some internal links within this document are funded and maintained by the Beef Checkoff. All other outgoing links are to websites maintained by third parties.